Friedrich Nietzsche [This document, which has been prepared by Ian Johnston of Malaspina University-College, Nanaimo, BC, is in the public domain and may be used by anyone, in whole or in part, without permission and without charge, provided the source is acknowledged. First Essay Good and Evil, Good and Bad Nov 30, · Words | 8 Pages. Srivaishnav Gandhe blogger.com English 30 Nov. Thesis Nietzsche and his Influence on the Modern Western World “Nietzsche is an atheist, a life-affirming nihilist, an extreme pessimist, a trickster, a gleefully defiant irreverent rebel and a sick hero”, my father said when I asked, “What does Nietzsche mean to you.” Nietzsche on Homer: Borne Back Ceaselessly into the Past Anonymous The Nietzsche Reader. Nietzsche’s short work Homer’s Contest is part of his attempt to develop an axiology that reinstates morality within the realm of aesthetic existence, grounding lofty ideas like “good” and “evil” within a naturalistic framework. In this essay, he Estimated Reading Time: 6 mins
Nietzsche: Genealogy of Morals: First Essay
PhilosophyPsychology. PhilosophersBehavioral Psychology. Friedrich NietzscheMorality. Nietzsche uses an etymological approach to prove that the concept of good originated from the nobles, after criticizing nietzsche essay view of the English nietzsche essay. From the nobles came master morality and here, the noble views himself as the standard of values he applies to the world and after his positive self-affirmation, he judges the less fortunate and weaker as bad. From this, they derive the idea of good. However, nietzsche essay, after a careful reading of the first essay, he later shows there is a tension between them, and they are not as different as he shows them to be.
This essay shall explain the reason why Nietzsche writes about master and slave morality, their distinction, why Nietzsche makes his view so confusing and conclude that while master and slave morality initially seem like opposites, they are not as they have knotted origins and they are rooted in the same soil. Good acts are non-egoistical ones which are useful and provide society with certain kinds of values while bad acts egoistical are the opposite. Eventually, we begin to see good acts as intrinsically good in themselves rather than them being good because they are useful to society.
We forget why they are good. Horace B. Samuel, M. and J. Kennedy Edinburgh and London,nietzsche essay, section 5, nietzsche essay, pg. In master morality, good is whatever benefits the nobles and from this, nietzsche essay, they derive what is bad. It can be described as being active, nietzsche essay, as what is bad is simply a lack of goodness. Nobles have words for good and words for bad and these words refer back to their lives. By stating that something is good, nietzsche essay, they are reaffirming their existence. They do not think of the community but look at what helps them to flourish. The masters view themselves as superior to the slaves and believe that they are the standard of values they apply to the world.
When they say a thing is good or bad, they are not making moral evaluations. The moral nietzsche essay of good and bad are a much later account of our moral system. By morally evaluating something, nietzsche essay, you are attacking and judging it. Masters do not care about that as they are above nietzsche essay. They do not care about what other people think. This makes the reader not want to resonate with them and prefer to be a noble, nietzsche essay. At the beginning of the first essay, it seems that Nietzsche is making the distinction between nobles masters and non- nobles slaves.
However, nietzsche essay is important to note that they should not be mapped as social types as they are psychological types, that have evolved through socio-political circumstances. They are like arch types for example, like a ruler and his citizens or a general and squire. It does not mean an actual master and slave. Thus, nietzsche essay, we can see how they are opposites and do nietzsche essay seem to be related in any way. Noble existence is divided into two and namely, they are the priests and knights. The knights are noble warriors. They see their actions as good and do not care about whether it has helped society or not. Thus, they try to neutralise the power of the knights and make them evil, nietzsche essay, and they do this because they want to blame the strong for their strength.
They choose to live the life of the weak and then blame the knights for their being weak. Nietzsche criticises the priests for this and describes the priestly form as evil. Nietzsche essay says that they have a weak desire to nietzsche essay the strong for their strength and have a weak desire to credit themselves with choosing to be weak. Instead, they engage in psychological warfare, and thus they invent a false account of human action, by implementing the concept of a transformation of values. However, one question that arises, is that how can the priests be nobles if they have a slavish mentality? According to what we know so far this is not possible, nietzsche essay. This leads to the reader being confused. The answer to this shall be explained later on in the essay.
Initially, we want to be a master as nietzsche essay are powerful, and Nietzsche presents them as appealing and invokes the desire to be a master and not a slave. However, nietzsche essay, after further reading of the first essay, you begin to become confused as the knights are shown as barbaric while the priests are shown as creative. Thus, they use an alternative route and Nietzsche says that through the powerlessness of nietzsche essay priests they win. This suggests that the priests are not powerless as such as they are victorious over the knights. He uses the example of the move from Rome to Judea. He talks about the rise of Judaism and Christianity and how the priests transformed the values of everyone. The priests cannot fight on the battlefield of the knights, as they would fail.
Thus, nietzsche essay, they try to undermine the value system that favours the knights, which they are successful at doing, nietzsche essay. This is why there is a Christian framework underneath everything. Nietzsche sees this as impressive and he calls the priests creative and praises them. Without the priests, nietzsche essay, history would not as interesting as it is as this was something that no one expected to happen, especially as this infrastructure still exists to this day. There is not a one-dimensional form of power, as power comes in different forms, nietzsche essay. However, this is because they do not believe nietzsche essay these are atrocities however, this does that change the fact that they are still atrocities. Thus, the nobles are shown as being barbaric which nietzsche essay in further uncertainty about the text.
Nietzsche makes it seem like you know what he is talking about and you think it is familiar, nietzsche essay, but when you go deeper you realise that it is actually disturbing. Nietzsche essay wants us to feel that there is a tension between master and slave morality. There is tension from a surface reading of the text and an in-depth reading. Initially reading the first essay most people would want to be nobles, and then they find out that they are barbaric. The slaves that you initially despised then become the creatives and Nietzsche says humanity would be stupid without the suffering of the slaves as their suffering lead to all of this creativity. Thus, nietzsche essay, you feel less resistant to be a slave, as nietzsche essay masters are seen as horrifying.
In addition, Nietzsche presents master and slave morality as opposites, but they are knotted, nietzsche essay. while it appears that they are initially opposites, Nietzsche simply makes distinctions between them, and these distinctions do not make them opposites. Instead, he says, […] It might even be possible that nietzsche essay constitutes the value of those good and honoured things resides precisely in their being artfully related, knotted and crocheted to these wicked, apparently antithetical things, perhaps even in their being essentially identical with them. That there is this thing called good and it has this kind of values, and this thing called bad and it has this kind of values, nietzsche essay, and they are distinct. The first essay is saying that this is a metaphysical kind of fate, that somehow these things have to have opposite origins, completely separate values, nietzsche essay.
Nietzsche suggests at the end here, is nietzsche essay what we take to be absolute distinctions, when we go back down to the roots, nietzsche essay, we will find out that they are kind of knotted. This is a completely different kind of value system; the idea is that underneath these are linked nietzsche essay in perverse ways. Nietzsche shows that they are distinctions to be nietzsche essay, but they cannot be absolute opposites, nietzsche essay, as they are knotted together by their roots, nietzsche essay. They have origins. Masters and slaves are not distinctively opposite from one another. In his book Ecce Homo where he looks back at the Genealogy of Morals, He says it starts with clear skies but then:.
Nietzsche uses a weather metaphor to show initially everything seems very straightforward, nietzsche essay, but then Nietzsche changes what we think we know about the text and through this, we get to see glimpses of the truth, through the unruliness and confusion of the storm, and then in the end, there is a tremendous explosion nietzsche essay what the truth is. Thus, nietzsche essay, it is uncanny. This is a completely different kind of way of revealing the truth, and we are told the kind of approach Nietzsche is going to adopt. He warns us hereto tread very carefully, as he is going to surprise us. There is going to be suspense, a feeling of disquiet, nietzsche essay, a tension, nietzsche essay.
However, why does Nietzsche make everything so complicated? Why does he go about it this way? Why are the priests nobles if they are slaves and nobles are masters? Why is there so much uncertainty while reading the text? This is because Nietzsche wants us to see a new truth. If we understand it then we nietzsche essay then take a step back and criticise it. Nietzsche wants to create a certain kind of need and tension, a demand. He does it this way as it is internalised and is our first nature. We are not conscious of it, and nietzsche essay it is the very foundation of all our fears, loves, attachments, desires, nietzsche essay, insecurities, hate, etc.
all affective drives ; and thus, we will be resistant to what he says if he tells us directly. They serve as a need, nietzsche essay, as they are why we think what we think and as such cannot be criticized or changed easily. This is why Nietzsche argues that it will be a very painful experience and says it is not impersonal and he also went through this experience. All our values are rooted in psychological soil, so by showing us are values are wrong it will not affect us. It has to go deep down to the origins the nietzsche essay and ruffle it. Thus, you do not know where you stand anymore, and can then look at your values. Nietzsche wants us to be unsettled and disturbed and make us realise both aspects of our soul.
And make us understand that we can overcome our value systems by changing it. This is the overall aim of the Genealogy of Morals. Masters and slaves are just symbolic.
Nietzsche - Genealogy - 3rd Essay (1, 11-19)
, time: 34:22Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche Essay | blogger.com
Nietzsche expressed his opinion regarding traditional morality by concentrating on the typology of the "slave" and "master" morality. He examined the etymology of the German words gut and bose (good and bad) and arrived to the conclusion that the original distinction between good and bad was a descriptive one, a simple non-moral reference to the ones who were masters as Free Nietzsche Essays and Papers Modernity and Nietzsche. The purpose of this paper is to first trace the developments that led up to modernity. Next I nietzsche. Friedrich Nietzsche outlines the evolution of mankind from religion to science Nietzsche says “ simply denoted, the plebeian man in contrast to the aristocratic man ”[footnoteRef] However, by the end of this essay, it will be shown that this is simply a superficial reading of the first essay and is simply not the case
No comments:
Post a Comment